There should not be formal public discussion: Human rights defenders
July 2, 13:00

The government’s new draft on the order of organizing and holding public discussions is put to public discussion on e-draft.am. 62 voted for and 38 against.   

Heriknaz Tigranyan from Transparency International and Artur Sakunts from Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor office touched upon the draft’s problematic clauses at July 2 Media Center discussion.

The yes or no answers on e-draft.am will not significantly affect the future outcome of the draft as they  only reflect attitude. And even 100% against attitude does not mean that the authors of the draft can get that negative voting till the end”, said Heriknaz Tigranyan.

Tigranyan notes that in public perceptions participation in any process assumes meetings with specialized community or stakeholders, organizing open hearings and discussions.  

Read more.

Print Friendly and PDF
More
Armenia is one of the last in the region in the number of vaccinated people. What are the risks?
Science, security, state. What is the role of science in ensuring security and state development?
Armenia at the crossroads of geopolitical interests. How to respond to external challenges?
Case of extorting testimony with anti-gas. Why is the trial delayed?
Armenia-EU Agreement. Will there be a dialogue with Europe?
Armenia is in a seismically active zone. What will happen in case of a new earthquake?
Martial Լaw: Restricted Media
Psychological Dangers of War Journalism
One of the faces of war. Danger of ecosystem in Artsakh
Bad Peace or Good War? What is the Solution to the Artsakh Problem?
Ban on Import of Turkish Goods. What Alternative Solutions are Offered?
"Online Education։ Experience and Trouble"
"Independence. It was hard to obtain, harder to preserve"
“Changes in the Electoral System: What does the Professional Committee on Constitutional Reforms suggest?”
Follow us on social networks
Registration of events
Services
Videos
Press Releases
Events
Armenia-Turkey Events