There should not be formal public discussion: Human rights defenders
The government’s new draft on the order of organizing and holding public discussions is put to public discussion on 62 voted for and 38 against.

Heriknaz Tigranyan from Transparency International and Artur Sakunts from Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly Vanadzor office touched upon the draft’s problematic clauses at July 2 Media Center discussion.

The yes or no answers on will not significantly affect the future outcome of the draft as they  only reflect attitude. And even 100% against attitude does not mean that the authors of the draft can get that negative voting till the end”, said Heriknaz Tigranyan.

Tigranyan notes that in public perceptions participation in any process assumes meetings with specialized community or stakeholders, organizing open hearings and discussions.  

According to paragraph 10 the body holding public discussions on its official website and on the joint website of publishing legal act drafts publishes the draft of the normative legal act, its grounds and other materials according to their disposition. And article 20 defines that public discussions can be held through meetings with specialized people or stakeholders via discussions, public surveys and telecommunication means.  

This means that the body who drew or adopted the legal act is not obliged to organize public discussions that in turn provides sufficient ground that publishing the legal act only on websites fulfills the requirement of the law''.

According to the speakers paragraphs 20 and 21 contain logical contradiction. If the public discussion holder according to paragraph 20 has initiated and held a public discussion then it must publish an announcement on its official and joint websites about the place, time and time-frames.

“There is no mention in the government’s draft about how the recommendations affect the draft. Namely if the overall opinion is negative that means the draft must be radically reviewed or be annulled.  The recommendations being rejected the grounds and clarifications must be provided”, says Tigranyan. 

According to Artur Sakunts many issues relating to the new order of the public discussions are conditioned with some clauses enshrined in the law on “Legal Acts”. “Naturally, as a result of discussions some recommendations must be made to amend the law. We can’t make amendments that contradict the law. We face two issues relating to the order and legal acts amendment in the law.”

He thinks public institutions like public councils must also be touched upon with the latters being public discussion institutions. Other public discussion formats are not limited with this. The minister can hold a discussion at his public council and say I did hold a public discussion. There format of the public discussion must be clear-cut.”

The rights defender also expressed concern about the influence of recommendations during public discussions. “The discussion should not be formal. We have already passed the stage of discussion for discussion’s sake. When recommendations are rejected the grounds of rejection must be presented and when they are accepted there must be improvements. That is to say content participation must be provided rather than numbers.”

For more please watch the video.

Lilit Arakelyan, Media Center project editor/coordinator.

Print Friendly and PDF
More Press Releases
Election Race in the Armenian Online Platforms - 2018
Region research center conducted a research on Election Race in the Armenian Online Platforms – 2018 researching 22 Facebook pages of the political forces standing in the elections in 6 online platforms since November 1.
On December 18 HCA Vanadzor office presented a report on The Rights of Army Recruits in Winter 2017 and Summer 2018 at Media Center.
“The New Parliament: Mechanisms to Control the Authorities and Shape Counterbalance”.
On December 14 Media Center initiated an online live debate at A1Plus pavilion on “The New Parliament: Mechanisms to Control the Authorities and Shape Counterbalance”.
Human Rights Violations in Penitentiary Institutions in 2017-2018
The years long prevailing issues in penitentiary institutions remain unsolved. This was the note struck by public group of monitors conducting supervision over RA ministry of justice penitentiary institutions on December 13 Media Center discussion.
Human Rights in 2018: Annual Sum Up
For 25-30 years issues related to human rights violations in Armenia have been in our spotlight: Such was the notice of Larisa Alaverdyan, head of “Fighting Against Violations of Law” NGO, first Ombudsperson of Armenia on December 12 at Media Center press conference.
Follow us on social networks
Registration of events
Press Releases
Armenia-Turkey Events